ENERGIZER messed up datasheet for AA NiMH critical information missing

[Kiriakos GR]

I am trying to compare ENERGIZER NiMH cells due their datasheet and I do Fail ...

Under investigation NH12-800 (HR03)  VS NH12-700 (HR03)

An Australian website posted the information .... 
NH12-800 (HR03) Max 500 Maximum Charge Cycle
NH12-700 (HR03) Max 1000 Maximum Charge Cycle

Dear people of ENERGIZER, if you plan to write somewhere the Maximum Charge Cycle per cell, you do that within the datasheet.
If you also have the wish to let us know regarding product Lifespan in years?  Please do that by using the datasheet.

I have proofs that datasheet production of ENERGIZER since 2008 and later this sucks big time.
With ENERGIZER this having a yearly revenue of over two billions dollars, I bet that you can do better job with the datasheet.
Delete everything and remake them at a length of three pages its one.
Ask from your well paid engineers at the factory, them to do the job.

[Andrew-88]

I think that this topic it does explains allot.
https://www.ittsb.eu/forum/index.php?topic=2176.0

ENERGIZER this has active three different contracts.
Batteries for EU distribution.
Batteries for USA distribution.
Batteries for ASIA distribution.

Its batch manufactured by a different factory, or be imported from Japan.
 
When ENERGIZER this has three differently manufactured products, under a single product code, the brand is obligated to have or offer, a specific datasheet per its continent.

The entire technical community, this gets confused when evaluating ENERGIZER retails offerings.
ENERGIZER this has two options, to fix the problem, or to leave this unfixed.

Kiriakos he did remove the option, of a problem be hidden under the carpet.