Who needs a clamp meter with thin jaws? THERE IS NO ANSWERS ON THAT.
Clamp meter jaws diameter this never was a matter of choice.
Everything started when a specific AC Current coil, this were adopted as current sensor.
And all industry started replicating this basic design.
Many decades later, a new sensor type shown, and this is flexible loop sensor, this technology came with an strong disadvantage, it cannot measure with precision below 1A AC current.
15 years old innovation, this is the so called as modern design, this having
thin jaws.
No one explained from our metrology people, of what might be the strong disadvantage of this sensor?
Only expert eyes, they can conceive the truth, the strong disadvantage, it cannot measure with precision below 1A AC current.
Two Taiwanese industries, showoff at 2026, their own NEW models of clamp meter with thin jaws.
And their motive was adding something at their portfolio, so this to look as complete.
The outcome is the same, an clamp meter at 600A or 1000A, with out any in between current range.
It appears that is not possible having 40/400A ranges with thin jaws.

Another product design mistake, the use of thin jaws this driving product design of entire clamp meter, this having and narrow body.
An narrow body, this makes the product fragile, an simple fall over concrete at 1~2m distance, this will be destructive.
Narrow body = smaller battery power storage.
At least at my side of the world, Europe, I have never see electrical distribution box this be tiny.
The theoretical marketing excuse for using thin jaws, this is at junction boxes.
Junction boxes these having LOW CURRENT connections, at 6A to 10A AC.
Why then one expert electrician to use an 400A clamp, so to measure 6A to 10A AC?