Final conclusion ... 8.4V PP3 worldwide this has
as nominal voltage specification at standard charge the value of
10.3V.
The theoretical
10.5V this is
maximum allowed. These poorly made ANSMANN datasheets, they mention 10.5V in text, but the damn
standard charge graph, by zooming in, it does show
10.3V.
The voltages as 10.4V up to 14.5, these are references relative to
Fast Charge. I do not perform any fast charge here....
According to my own charger, this succeed to reach highest charging voltage
CH1 10.196V and
CH2 10.175V .
This is approximately 100mV lower from the ideal 10.300V
An good designed charger this should be able to load a NiMH at 80% SOC, this little charger delivers much higher performance with a pair of new batteries.
Just for the shake of correctness, I am now using my bench-top and professional PSU, output voltage at 10.3V, both batteries connected in parallel.
Both of my ANSMANN Typ280, they require a current of 19mA from the PSU, and both stay frozen at 21C.
Just as experiment I did force 10.400V for two hours, and one of the two batteries this started to get warm at 50mA CC Mode.
When I lowered the voltage to 10.300V, both batteries temperature returned to ambient.

I could never imagine that just 100mV on top, they will have such an impact.
I feel much more educated now, about 8.4V PP3 charging conditions, and of what can cause
a Thermal runaway.Now I am fully aware of what technology my new charger for 8.4V PP3 this it must using, and output current this is must be also selected carefully.
About my V-228 testing process I did ended it, when I realize that there is no voltage increase at any of my batteries.
An tiny voltage fluctuation this appeared at both charging channel simultaneously, but I did realize soon enough, that ACV Mains fluctuation this was causing it.
This was a long journey, over 40 hours of monitoring and experimenting,
but I did learned a lot !!